Phase 0 is the strategic preparation stage that establishes clarity, alignment, and readiness before committing resources to an SAP transformation. This work determines whether the implementation should start at all, and if so, how. The alternative is what happens in most programs: assumptions about migration paths, custom code value, and data quality go unchallenged. Then they
Six months into an SAP S/4HANA migration, your enterprise architect asks a straightforward question: “Where’s the data mapping specification for customer master records?” Nobody knows. The file exists somewhere, but ‘somewhere’ might as well be nowhere. The consultant who created it left four months ago. It lives in a SharePoint folder with hundreds of other
Most SAP S/4HANA programs begin with the same exercise: document the current state. Teams spend months mapping existing processes, cataloging customizations, interviewing stakeholders across every department, and producing detailed as-is and to-be documentation. The logic is reasonable. You need to understand where you are before you can decide where you are going. The problem is
SAP Joule now offers more than 40 specialized AI agents and 2,400 skills across finance, HR, procurement, and supply chain. Gartner forecasts that 62% of cloud ERP spending will flow toward AI-enabled solutions by 2027, up from 14% in 2024 (Gartner). The investment is real. The capabilities are advancing fast, and yet, six out of
Nothing as such. There are many methodologies out there, but most align around the SAP Activate methodology. SAP has had an official implementation methodology for decades. ASAP came first. Then SAP Activate replaced it, bringing agile principles, fit-to-standard workshops, and guided configuration. It is a well-structured framework. Yet, with all those decades of experience and
A McKinsey study of over 5,400 large IT projects found that they run an average of 45% over budget and deliver 56% less value than predicted. The budget overruns make headlines. The value gap is the quieter, more expensive problem. And in most cases, that gap traces back to the same place: change management that
Gartner predicts that by 2027, more than 70% of recently implemented ERP initiatives will fail to meet their original business case goals fully, and as many as 25% will fail catastrophically (Gartner ERP Research). The software keeps getting better. The tools keep getting better. Implementation Methods and consulting approaches keep getting better. Yet, the failure
Why replacing late discovery with early truth is the most important decision in your SAP transformation ERP Transformations run into the same challenging patterns. Teams spend months designing on paper, stakeholders sign off on blueprints, and well into the Build phase, the real system slowly appears. Much of what was agreed to turns out to
And What It Costs to Fix Them After Commitments Are Locked The pattern every SAP leader recognizes For months, the transformation has looked stable. Design workshops generate detailed process diagrams. Requirements fill hundreds of pages. Budgets get approved. Status dashboards show green. Then the system appears. Processes behave differently than expected. Integrations fail in ways
Many SAP programs go live successfully, but leave the company dependent on external help to change the system. This is often because, during the implementation or upgrade, not enough was done to upskill the internal resources. The software works, and the processes run, but when something needs to change, the internal team often turns back

Ready to get started? Have a few questions? Schedule a call and begin your LeapGreat journey.